Welcome
Electronic ISSN: 2423-429x
print ISSN: 2476-7182
Journal of Preventive Medicine
The Journal of Preventive Medicine is affiliated with Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences. This biquarterly education journal will publish Persian articles with English abstract to promote qualitative and quantitative education researches. This journal works as an official channel through which researchers can publish their new findings in different types of studies such as Letter to the Editor, Review Articles, qualitative article, short articles, etc. The full text of articles will be available for free on the website of the journal (http://jpm.hums.ac.ir). The journal is ready to receive valuable articles of professors, researchers and students through online submission.
In this journal, the articles will be accepted and published in the following branches
Various Aspects of Preventive Medicine and Health SciencesEmail: jpmhums.ac.ir - journalofpreventivemedicinegmail.com
Editorial Office: School Of Health,Alley Bustan 10, Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Jomhoori Islami Blvd, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Tel: 07633336202 - 07633338583
Full Journal Title: Journal of Preventive Medicine
Abbreviation Journal Title: JPM
Publisher: Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Frequency: 4 Issues since 2014-2016, 2 Issues since 2017-2019, 4 Issues since 2020-
Chairman: Abdoul Hossain Madani.PhD
Editor in-Chief: Mehdi Zare.PhD
Deputy Editor in-Chief: Moussa Soleimani. PhD
Executive Manager: Moussa Soleimani. PhD
Internal Manager: Hamidreza Ghafari.PhD
Literary Editor: Moussa Soleimani. PhD, Hamidreza Ghafari.PhD
English Editor: Mehdi Zare.PhD
Site and Communication Expert: Faegheh Zarei
Electronic ISSN: 2423-429x
Print ISSN: 2476-7182
Language: Persian / English
Country: The Islamic Republic of Iran
Year: 2014
Online Submission: http://jpm.hums.ac.ir
Email: jpmhums.ac.ir - journalofpreventivemedicinegmail.com
Editorial Office: School Of Health,Alley Bustan 10, Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Jomhoori Islami Blvd, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Tel: 07633336202 - 07633338583
Edit contents | Post date: 2017/05/30 |
ChairmanIndexing
Profile Title | Title Stutus | Link |
Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC) | Indexing | Link |
Google Scholar | Indexing | Link |
Magiran | Indexing | Link |
IranMedex | Indexing | Link |
WHO | Indexing | Link |
Index Copernicus | Indexing | Link |
Noormags | Indexing | Link |
Civilica | Indexing | Link |
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) | Indexing | Link |
Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) | Indexing | Link |
Scientific World Index Directory (SCIWIN) | Indexing | Link |
(Directory of Open Access Scholary Resources (ROAD) | Indexing | Link |
Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI) | Indexing | Link |
Scientific Information Database (SID) | Indexing | Link |
Cite Factor | Indexing | Link |
Electronic Journals library | - | Link |
Ethical Considerations
Preventive Medicine expects the highest ethical standards from their authors, reviewers and editors when conducting research, submitting papers and throughout the peer-review process. JPM expects all authors, reviewers and editors to consider COPE and ICMJE’s reporting guidelines in scientific writing.
Open Access and Copyright
JPM is a Platinum Open Access Journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited. Upon submitting an article, authors are asked to specify their agreement to abide by an open access Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0). Under the terms of this license, authors retain ownership of the copyright of their articles. The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. Abstracts and PDF format of all articles published by the journal are freely available to everyone instantly upon publication.
Plagiarism policy
"Journal of Preventive Medicine" dose not check the submitted manuscripts for plagiarism.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Authors' Responsibilities
• Author(s) should actively participate in the peer review process and provide suitable responses to the comments raised by peer reviewers on time.
• All authors must have significantly contributed to the research.
• Author(s) must state that all data in the article are real and authentic.
• All authors are required to provide the flawless manuscripts, namely, rectify all the problems.
Peer Review/Responsibility for the Reviewers
Editorial Responsibilities
• The Editor-in-chief has complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
• Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept.
• When errors are found in a manuscript, the editors promote publication of correction or retraction
• the anonymity of reviewers is preserved
All authors of must disclose any and all conflicts of interest they may have with publication of the manuscript or an institution or product that is mentioned in the manuscript and/or is important to the outcome of the study presented. Authors should also disclose conflict of interest with products that compete with those mentioned in their manuscript.
Conflicts Patient Consent Forms
The protection of a patient's right to privacy is essential. Please collect and keep copies of patients’ consent forms on which patients or other subjects of your experiments clearly grant permission for the publication of photographs or other material that might identify them. If the consent form for your research did not specifically include this, please obtain it or remove the identifying material.
A statement to the effect that such consent had been obtained must be included in the ‘Methods’ section of your paper. If necessary the Editors may request a copy of any consent forms.
Manuscripts may be rejected if the Editor considers that the research has not been carried out within an appropriate ethical framework.
Publishing Ethics Issues
• Journal of Preventive Medicine precludes business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.
• The Editors-in-Chief are always willing to publish corrections, clarifications.
• Plagiarism: Use of verbatim texts from other sources without acknowledgement is prohibited. The content of all articles must be the original work of authors and must not be plagiarized from other articles.
• Data falsification/fabrication: Falsification is the practice of omitting or altering research materials, data, or processes so that the results of the research are no longer accurately reflected. Fabrication is the practice of inventing data or results and reporting them in the research. Both of these misconducts are fraudulent and seriously alter the integrity of research. Therefore, articles must be written based on original data and use of falsified or fabricated data is strongly prohibited.
• Image manipulation: Journal of Preventive Medicine encourages authors to send their original images. All digital images in manuscripts accepted for publication will be checked for inappropriate manipulation. No specific feature within an image may be enhanced, obscured, moved, removed, or introduced. Adjustments of brightness, contrast, or color balance are acceptable as long as they are applied to the entire image and do not misrepresent any information present in the original, including the background. The editors will request the original data from the authors to compare the manipulated figures in cases suspected of inappropriate manipulation.
This guide for reviewers contains information about basic considerations that should be applied when reviewing a manuscript that has been submitted to Preventive Medicine, and about the editorial standards of the journal. Submitted manuscripts are usually reviewed by two or more experts. Peer reviewers will be asked to recommend whether a manuscript should be accepted, revised or rejected. They should also alert the editors of any issues relating to author misconduct such as plagiarism and unethical behavior.
Publication of research articles by Preventive Medicine is dependent primarily on their validity and coherence, as judged by peer reviewers and editors. The reviewers may also be asked whether the writing is comprehensible and how interesting they consider the article to be. Submitted manuscripts will be sent to peer reviewers, unless they are out of scope or below the interest threshold of Preventive Medicine, or if the presentation or written English is of an unacceptably low standard.
Reviewers are asked to provide detailed, constructive comments that will help the editors make a decision on publication and the author(s) improve their manuscript. A key issue is whether the work has serious flaws that should preclude its publication, or whether there are additional experiments or data required to support the conclusions drawn. Where possible, reviewers should provide references to substantiate their comments.
Reviewers should address the points below and indicate whether they consider any required revisions to be 'major compulsory revisions', 'minor essential revisions' or 'discretionary revisions'. In general, revisions are likely to be 'Major compulsory revisions' if additional controls are required to support the claims or the interpretations are not supported by the data, if further analysis is required that may change the conclusions, or if the methods used are inadequate or statistical errors have been made.
The research question posed by the authors should be easily identifiable and understood. It is useful to both the editors and authors if reviewers comment on the originality and importance of the study within the context of its field. If the research question is unoriginal because related work has been published previously, please give references. Reviewers should ask themselves after reading the manuscript if they have learnt something new and if there is a clear conclusion from the study.
If you feel that inappropriate controls have been used please say so, indicating the reasons for your concerns, and suggesting alternative controls where appropriate. If you feel that further experimental/clinical evidence is required to substantiate the results, please provide details.
The interpretation should discuss the relevance of all the results in an unbiased manner. Are the interpretations overly positive or negative? Conclusions drawn from the study should be valid and result directly from the data shown, with reference to other relevant work as applicable. Have the authors provided references wherever necessary?
Please remark on the suitability of the methods for the study, which should be clearly described and reproducible by peers in the field. If statistical analyses have been carried out, specify whether or not they need to be assessed specifically by an additional reviewer with statistical expertise.
Please comment on any improvements that could be made to the study design to enhance the quality of the results. If any additional experiments are required, please give details. If novel experimental techniques were used please pay special attention to their reliability and validity.
Although the editorial team may also assess the quality of the written English, please do comment if you consider the standard is below that expected for a scientific publication. If the manuscript is organized in such a manner that it is illogical or not easily accessible to the reader please suggest improvements. Please provide feedback on whether the data are presented in the most appropriate manner; for example, is a table being used where a graph would give increased clarity? Are the figures of a high enough quality to be published in their present form?
Reviewers may recommend revisions for any or all of the following reasons: data need to be added to support the authors' conclusions; better justification is needed for the arguments based on existing data; or the clarity and/or coherence of the paper needs to be improved.
The study should adhere to ethical standards of scientific/medical research and the authors should declare that they have received ethics approval and or patient consent for the study, where appropriate. Whilst we do not expect reviewers to delve into authors' competing interests, if you are aware of any issues that you do not think have been adequately addressed, please inform the editorial office.
Any manuscript sent for peer review is a confidential document and should remain so until it is formally published.