----------------------------- -----------------------------
Volume 9, Issue 1 (Spring 2022)                   J Prevent Med 2022, 9(1): 38-49 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.HUMS.REC.1399.439


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Homayooni A, Hosseini Z. Investigating the Relationship Between Perceived Stress and Health Anxiety and the Quality of Life (QoL) During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Prevent Med 2022; 9 (1) :38-49
URL: http://jpm.hums.ac.ir/article-1-567-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
2- Tobacco and Health research center, Hormozgan university of medical sciences, Bandar abbas, Iran.  
Full-Text [PDF 4977 kb]   (972 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1535 Views)
Full-Text:   (1896 Views)
Extended Abstract
Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started as an epidemic in China in December 2019. This virus has spread rapidly worldwide and as a result, it was recognized as an epidemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. This disease is known as a great threat to physical and mental health and it affects the quality of life (QoL) of people by creating many psychological problems. Long quarantine period, fear of disease, mental fatigue, insufficient information, financial loss, loss of freedom, uncertainty about the condition of the disease, uncertainty of the time to control the disease, and the seriousness of the risk are among the stress factors that can affect the QoL of people during this pandemic. On the other hand, in the COVID-19 pandemic, health anxiety has increased in terms of frequency and intensity than before. In this situation, people with high health anxiety are prone to wrong and harmful perceptions of their physical changes and use all these changes as proof that they are infected with an infectious disease, which leads to maladaptive coping behaviors, such as excessive hand washing, social withdrawal, and shopping with panic. Accordingly, it is very important to identify the psychological effects of this disease on the mental health of people and its relationship with the QoL. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived stress and health anxiety, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
The current correlational descriptive research was done in 2021 on the residents of Isfahan over 16 years of age. In this study, 320 people were selected by the available sampling method. The inclusion criteria were: 1) being literate, 2) having access to the Internet to answer questions, 3) not suffering from psychological disorders, 4) having at least 16 years of age, 5) living in Isfahan, and 6) willingness to participate in the research. Exclusion criteria included people suffering from psychological disorders and unwillingness to participate in the research. In order to protect the health of the participants, the data were collected online using messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp and Telegram channels. The link to the questionnaire was made available to the participants through various online groups and the participants who received the link were requested to send it to the people they knew. Informed written consent was obtained from the people who participated in this study. Demographic questionnaire (information, such as gender, marital status, education level, age, employment status, smoking status, and suffering from certain underlying diseases), the Short Health Anxiety Questionnaire (SHAI) by Salkovskis et al., Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) by Cohen et al., and World Health Organization’s QoL Brief Questionnaire (WHOQoL-BREF) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using SPSS v. 24 software. For descriptive data, frequency, percentage, and minimum and maximum values were used, and for inferential data, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and regression analysis were used. A significance level of 95% (P<0.05) was considered.
Results
The results showed that 18.1% (58) of the participants in the research were male and 81.9% (262) were female. More than half of the participants (69.1%) were married and the rest were single (29.1%), widowed (0.6%), or divorced (1.2%). The majority of the participants (42.8%) had a bachelor’s degree. 36.6% of the participants were housewives. Also, 92.6% of the participants did not use any tobacco products. Only 6.6% of the participants were doctors, nurses, or members of the healthcare staff and 12.2% of the participants had underlying diseases. The average age of the participants in the research was 36.48 years (SD=11.25). The mean and standard deviation of the research variables were as follows: perceived stress 27.72 (8.65), perceived helplessness: 14.09 (5.24), perceived self-efficacy: 14.37 (4.66), health anxiety: 14.12 (7.74), probability of contracting the disease: 21.12 (6.46), negative consequences of contracting the disease: 1.91 (2.004), QoL: 26.87 (15.74), physical health: 24.58 (4.89), mental health: 26.19 (42.4), social relations: 9.96 (2.54) and environmental health: 26.22 ( 5.16). The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant negative relationship between perceived helplessness (r=-0.606), perceived stress (r=-0.706), probability of contracting the disease (r=-0.278), negative consequences of contracting illness (r=0.528), and health anxiety (r=0.369) with QoL (P<0.01). Also, there was a significant positive relationship between perceived self-efficacy and QoL (r=0.628, P<0.01). In addition, the results of the regression analysis showed that perceived self-efficacy, negative consequences of illness, and perceived helplessness can significantly predict 57.5% of the variance of QoL (P<0.01). The results indicated that each of these variables can explain the QoL with beta coefficients of 0.389, -0.3, and -0.284, respectively.
Discussion
The results of the study showed that the spread of the coronavirus has changed people’s living conditions and has had destructive psychological effects, such as stress and health anxiety.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

Ethical approval was received for this study from the Ethics Committee of the Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR.HUMS.REC.1399.439). 
Funding
This project is funded by a research grant from the Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences. The funding body (HUMS) didn't have any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Authors' contributions
Study design, data collection, statistical analysis and article writing: Atefeh Homayouni; Study design, cooperation in writing and revising the article: Zahra Hosseini.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the financial support of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences as well as all the participants in this research.

 
References
  1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223):507-13.  [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7]
  2. Schnirring L. Japan has 1st novel coronavirus case; China reports another death [Internet]. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. 2020. [Link]
  3. Moradzadeh R. The challenges and considerations of community-based preparedness at the onset of COVID-19 outbreak in Iran, 2020. Epidemiol Infect. 2020; 148:e82. [DOI:10.1017/S0950268820000783] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard Data. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [Link]
  5. Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6):2032. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17062032] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Yang L, Wu D, Hou Y, Wang X, Dai N, Wang G, et al. Analysis of psychological state and clinical psychological intervention model of patients with COVID-19. MedRxiv. 2020.  [DOI:10.1101/2020.03.22.20040899]
  7. Sun L, Sun Z, Wu L, Zhu Z, Zhang F, Shang Z, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of acute posttraumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. MedRxiv. 2020. [DOI:10.1101/2020.03.06.20032425]
  8. van Ballegooijen H, Goossens L, Bruin RH, Michels R, Krol M. Concerns, quality of life, access to care and productivity of the general population during the first 8 weeks of the coronavirus lockdown in Belgium and the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):227.  [DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06240-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Zhang W-r, Wang K, Yin L, Zhao W-f, Xue Q, Peng M, et al. Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Psychother Psychosom. 2020; 89(4):242-50.   [DOI:10.1159/000507639] [PMID] [PMCID]
  10. Aliakbari Dehkordi M, Eisazadeh F, Aghajanbigloo S. Psychological consequences of patients with Coronavirus (COVID-19): A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Health Psycholology. 2019; 2(2):9-20. [DOI:10.30473/ijohp.2020.52395.1074]
  11. Shahyad S, Mohammadi MT. [Psychological impacts of Covid-19 outbreak on mental health status of society individuals: A narrative review (Persian)]. J Mil Med. 2020; 22(2):184-92. [DOI:10.30491/JMM.22.2.184]
  12. Zarabadipour M, Asgari Ghonche MR, Asgari Ghonche S, Mirzadeh M. [Psychological evaluation of the factors affecting the stress caused by COVID-19 outbreak in the medical staff and the community of Qazvin, Iran Spring 2020 (Persian)]. Journal of Military Medicine. 2020; 22(6):517-25. [DOI:10.30491/JMM.22.6.517]
  13. Bailer J, Kerstner T, Witthöft M, Diener C, Mier D, Rist F. Health anxiety and hypochondriasis in the light of DSM-5. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2016; 29(2):219-39.  [DOI:10.1080/10615806.2015.1036243] [PMID]
  14. Witthöft M, Hiller W. Psychological approaches to origins and treatments of somatoform disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 6:257-83.   [DOI:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131505] [PMID]
  15. Asmundson GJ, Abramowitz JS, Richter AA, Whedon M. Health anxiety: Current perspectives and future directions. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010; 12(4):306-12. [DOI:10.1007/s11920-010-0123-9] [PMID]
  16. Asmundson GJ, Taylor S. How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. J Anxiety Disord. 2020; 71:102211. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102211] [PMID] [PMCID]
  17. Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020; 51:102083. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Jalloh MF, Li W, Bunnell RE, Ethier KA, O’Leary A, Hageman KM, et al. Impact of Ebola experiences and risk perceptions on mental health in Sierra Leone, July 2015. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(2):e000471.   [DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000471] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Lau JT, Griffiths S, Choi KC, Tsui HY. Avoidance behaviors and negative psychological responses in the general population in the initial stage of the H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:139.   [DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-10-139] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Alimohammadi F, Setodeh-Asl N, Karami A. [Designing a model of quality of life in elderly based on perceived stress and tolerance of distress (Persian)]. J Health Care. 2019; 21(1):53-65. [DOI:10.29252/jhc.21.1.53]
  21. Salkovskis PM, Rimes KA, Warwick H, Clark D. The Health Anxiety Inventory: Development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychol Med. 2002; 32(5):843-53.  [DOI:10.1017/S0033291702005822] [PMID]
  22. Abramowitz JS, Olatunji BO, Deacon BJ. Health anxiety, hypochondriasis, and the anxiety disorders. Behav Ther. 2007; 38(1):86-94.  [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2006.05.001] [PMID]
  23. Karimi J, Homayoni A, Homayoni F. [Evaluation of psychometric properties of the health anxiety inventory (Persian)]. Hakim Health Systems Research Journal. 2015; 17(4):297-305. [Link]
  24. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4):385-96. [DOI:10.2307/2136404] [PMID]
  25. Taghavi SM, Mokarami H, Nazifi M, Choobineh A, Marioryad H, Kujerdi MF. The influence of socio-demographic, health and work-related factors on health-related quality of life among Iranian industrial workers. Health. 2014; 6(16):2250-60. [DOI:10.4236/health.2014.616261]
  26. Usefy A, Ghassemi GR, Sarrafzadegan N, Mallik S, Baghaei A, Rabiei K. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in an Iranian adult sample. Community Ment Health J. 2010; 46(2):139-47.  [DOI:10.1007/s10597-009-9282-8] [PMID]
  27. Abdelghani M, Mahdy R, El-Gohari H. Health anxiety to COVID-19 virus infection and its relationship to quality of life in a sample of health care workers in Egypt: A cross-sectional study. Arch Psychiatry Psychother. 2021; 23(1):19-28. [DOI:10.12740/APP/130304]
  28. Hayter AL, Salkovskis PM, Silber E, Morris RG. The impact of health anxiety in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Misperception, misattribution and quality of life. Br J Clin Psychol. 2016; 55(4):371-86. [DOI:10.1111/bjc.12106] [PMID]
  29. Trougakos JP, Chawla N, McCarthy JM. Working in a pandemic: Exploring the impact of COVID-19 health anxiety on work, family, and health outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2020; 105(11):1234-45. [DOI:10.1037/apl0000739] [PMID]
  30. Korkmaz S, Kazgan A, Çekiç S, Tartar AS, Balcı HN, Atmaca M. The anxiety levels, quality of sleep and life and problem-solving skills in healthcare workers employed in COVID-19 services. J Clin Neurosci. 2020; 80:131-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.073] [PMID] [PMCID]
  31. Hedari Shams J, Mohammadzadeh KA, Maher A. [Correlation between health literacy and quality of life with health anxiety in outpatient patients referred to Shahid Beheshti Specialized Polyclinic in Karaj (Persian)]. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2020; 9(1):1-9. [Link]
  32. Taylor S, Asmundson GJ. Treating health anxiety: A cognitive-behavioral approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. [Link]
  33. Taylor S. The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019. [Link]
  34. Farahati M. Psychological consequences of coronavirus outbreak in society. social impact assessment. 2020; 1(S 2):207-25. [Link]
  35. Çelmeçe N, Menekay M. The effect of stress, anxiety and burnout levels of healthcare professionals caring for COVID-19 patients on their quality of life. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:597624. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597624] [PMID] [PMCID]
  36. Tejoyuwono AAT, Nugraha RP, Fahdi FK. The effect of mental health status on the quality of life of faculty of medicine students during the pandemic Coronavirus disease 2019 period. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021; 9(E):645-52. [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6161]
  37. Qi M, Li P, Moyle W, Weeks B, Jones C. Physical activity, health-related quality of life, and stress among the Chinese adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(18):6494.   [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186494] [PMID] [PMCID]
  38. Racic M, Todorovic R, Ivkovic N, Masic S, Joksimovic B, Kulic M. Self-perceived stress in relation to anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life among health professions students: A cross-sectional study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Slovenian J Public Health. 2017; 56(4):251-9. [DOI:10.1515/sjph-2017-0034] [PMID] [PMCID]
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Psychology
Received: 2021/11/17 | Accepted: 2022/07/1 | Published: 2022/04/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.