----------------------------- -----------------------------
Volume 9, Issue 4 (Winter 2022)                   J Prevent Med 2022, 9(4): 360-375 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alavi A, Shahsavari S, Mahboobi M, Banihashemi S H. Factors Related to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Bandar Abbas, Iran: A Cross-sectional Study. J Prevent Med 2022; 9 (4) :360-375
URL: http://jpm.hums.ac.ir/article-1-653-en.html
1- Mother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
2- Social Determinants in Health Promotion Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 4854 kb]   (611 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (620 Views)
Full-Text:   (808 Views)
Introduction
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common and deadly cancer among women worldwide. The incidence of cervical cancer in developing countries is very high (>80%). Invasive cervical cancer is known as a preventable cancer due to its long pre-invasive period, availability of appropriate screening systems, and effective treatment of primary lesions. Fast and accurate screening programs are critical so that every woman with cervical cancer can receive the treatment she needed and avoid preventable deaths.

Methods
This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted during 2021-2022 on 810 women aged 15-49 years referred to health centers in Bandar Abbas, Iran. Those who had performed pap smear tests at regular and international standard intervals (according to age and general health) were included in the screening group, while those who did not perform the test or accidentally performed the test during a visit to a gynecologist without prior intention were included in the non-screening group. Inclusion criteria were age 15-49 years, being sexually active non-pregnant women, no cervical cancer, and consent to participate in the study. The exclusion criterion was the return of incomplete questionnaires. Considering the first type error of 5% and the estimation error of 5% using the formula, the sample size was obtained 329. Considering that cluster sampling method was used in this study, the calculated sample size was multiplied by the design effect (2.5) and the final sample size was determined 823. Thirteen questionnaires were excluded from the analysis due to being incomplete; therefore, the data of 810 participants were analyzed. The tool for collecting information was a researcher-made questionnaire with two parts. The first part was a demographic form and the second part was a Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) questionnaire. knowledge was measured with 14 items, attitude with 16 items, and practice with one item (screening/no screening). To determine the content validity of the tool, it was sent to 5 experts in health education and 5 gynecologists, and their opinions were used to modify the items. To determine the reliability of the tool, the test-retest method was used. The ICC value of 0.80 was obtained and the reliability of the questionnaire was approved. Quantitative variables such as knowledge and attitude were described as mean ± standard deviation. Categorized variables and qualitative variables were described using frequency and percentage. To investigate the relationship between demographic factors and cervical cancer screening, univariate and multivariate logistic regression and odds ratio (effect size) were used. Independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare the men score of knowledge and attitude based on demographic variables.

Results
Most of the participants were in the age group of 30-39 years. The likelihood of cervical cancer screening in women with 1-2 children compared to women without children was 25 times higher; in women with 3-5 children compared to women without children was 7.7 times higher; in married women compared to single women was 1.4 times higher; in women with moderate financial status compared to those with poor financial status was 9 times higher; and in women with good financial status compared to those with poor financial status was 23 times higher. One unit increase in knowledge score increased the chance of uterine cancer screening by 40%, and with one unit increase in attitude score, the chance of screening increased by 8%. There was no statistically significant difference in the knowledge score between different age groups (p=0.061). Tables 1 and 2 present the mean knowledge and attitude scores based on the demographic factors.






Discussion
The results of the present study can help to develop a targeted and effective intervention to increase the rate of cervical cancer screening in Bandar Abbas. The results showed that personal factors such as the number of children and financial status can be effective in increasing the rate of cervical cancer screening. Considering the prevalence of cervical cancer among women and the role of the Pap smear test in the early detection of this disease, it is recommended to use appropriate and cost-effective educational methods to promote the knowledge and attitude of women in Bandar Abbas regarding cervical cancer and its prevention methods.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was presented in the Committee of Ethics Council of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences and after the corrections (Code : IR.HUMS.REC.1401.202).

Funding
This article was done with the financial support of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences.

Authors' contributions
Study design, supervision of data collection, data analysis and manuscript review: Azin Alavi; Study design, data collection, data analysis and manuscript drafting: Seyed Hesamaddin Banihashemi; Design of the study and review of the manuscript: Saeede Shahsavari; Sample collection, analysis and cooperation in preparing the initial draft of the project: Mahsheed Mahboobi.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the financial support of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences and all the participants in this research.

 
References
  1. Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Cervical cancer in Iran: Integrative insights of epidemiological analysis. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2018; 8(3):18.[DOI:10.1051/bmdcn/2018080318] [PMID] [PMCID]
  2. Sumarmi S, Hsu YY, Cheng YM, Lee SH. Factors associated with the intention to undergo Pap smear testing in the rural areas of Indonesia: A health belief model. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1):138. [DOI:10.1186/s12978-021-01188-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-49. [DOI:10.3322/caac.21660] [PMID]
  4. Rezaianzadeh A, Dehghani SL, Mousavi M, Rezaeianzadeh R. The incidence of uterus cancer in Iran: A systematic review. Women’s Health Bull. 2017; 4(1):e42917. [DOI:10.17795/whb-42917]
  5. Ghalavandi S, Zarei F, Heidarnia A, Beiranvand R. A blended educational intervention program on Pap-test related behavior among Iranian women. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1):228. [DOI:10.1186/s12978-021-01281-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Kashyap N, Krishnan N, Kaur S, Ghai S. Risk factors of cervical cancer: A case-control study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019; 6(3):308-14. [DOI:10.4103/apjon.apjon_73_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Thapa N, Maharjan M, Xiong Y, Jiang D, Nguyen TP, Petrini MA, et al. Impact of cervical cancer on quality of life of women in Hubei, China. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):11993. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-30506-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
  8. Shirali E, Yarandi F, Ghaemi M, Montazeri A. Quality of life in patients with gynecological cancers: A web-based study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020; 21(7):1969-75. DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.7.1969] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Taneja N, Chawla B, Awasthi AA, Shrivastav KD, Jaggi VK, Janardhanan R. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on cervical cancer and screening among women in India: A review. Cancer Control. 2021; 28:10732748211010799. [DOI:10.1177/10732748211010799] [PMID] [PMCID]
  10. Abiodun OA, Olu-Abiodun OO, Sotunsa JO, Oluwole FA. Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and cervical screening uptake among adult women in rural communities in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:814. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-814] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Coronado Interis E, Anakwenze CP, Aung M, Jolly PE. Increasing cervical cancer awareness and screening in Jamaica: Effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 13(1):ijerph13010053. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph13010053] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. World Health Organisation (WHO). New recommendations for screening and treatment to prevent cervical cancer. Genewa: World Health Organisation; 2021. [Link]
  13. Amin R, Kolahi AA, Jahanmehr N, Abadi AR, Sohrabi MR. Disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 nationwide STEPS survey. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1594. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09705-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. Mousavi F, Shojaei P, Aryan H. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to Papsmear test among Iranian women. Int J Womens Health Wellness. 2018; 4(076):2474-1353. [DOI:10.23937/2474-1353/1510076]
  15. Bakht R, Shobeiri F, Roshanaei G, Fakouri E. [The factors affecting cervical cancer screening among addicted women of Hamedan in 2015: On the basis of protection motivation theory model (Persian)]. Jorjani Biomed J. 2016; 4(2):68-80. [Link]
  16. Parsa P, Aghababaii S, llah Roshanaei G, Rahmani S. [Cervical Cancer screening in postmenopausal women referring to Hamadan comprehensive health centers (Persian)]. Pajouhan Sci J. 2020; 18(2):58-63. [DOI:10.52547/psj.18.2.58]
  17. Chisale Mabotja M, Levin J, Kawonga M. Beliefs and perceptions regarding cervical cancer and screening associated with Pap smear uptake in Johannesburg: A cross-sectional study. Plos One. 2021; 16(2):e0246574.[DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246574] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Karimy M, Azarpira H, Araban M. Using health belief model constructs to examine differences in adherence to pap test recommendations among Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017; 18(5):1389-94. [DOI:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.5.1389] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Isabirye A, Mbonye MK, Kwagala B. Predictors of cervical cancer screening uptake in two districts of Central Uganda. Plos One. 2020; 15(12):e0243281. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243281] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Abamecha F, Tena A, Kiros G. Psychographic predictors of intention to use cervical cancer screening services among women attending maternal and child health services in Southern Ethiopia: The theory of planned behavior (TPB) perspective. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):434. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-6745-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  21. Khazaee-Pool M, Yargholi F, Jafari F, Ponnet K. Exploring Iranian women's perceptions and experiences regarding cervical cancer-preventive behaviors. BMC Womens Health. 2018; 18(1):145. [DOI:10.1186/s12905-018-0635-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Budkaew J, Chumworathayi B. Factors associated with decisions to attend cervical cancer screening among women aged 30-60 years in Chatapadung Contracting Medical Unit, Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(12):4903-7. [DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.12.4903] [PMID]
  23. Wollancho W, Amdissa D, Bamboro S, Wasihun Y, Tareke KG, Gizaw AT. Determining behavioral intention and its predictors towards cervical cancer screening among women in Gomma district, Jimma, Ethiopia: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Plos One. 2020; 15(11):e0238472. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0238472] [PMID] [PMCID]
  24. Getahun T, Kaba M, Derseh BT. Intention to screen for cervical cancer in Debre Berhan Town, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia: Application of theory of planned behavior. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2020; 2020:3024578. [DOI:10.1155/2020/3024578] [PMID] [PMCID]
  25. Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Fernandez ME. Understanding cervical cancer screening intentions among Latinas using an expanded theory of planned behavior model. Behav Med. 2013; 39(3):66-72. [DOI:10.1080/08964289.2013.799452] [PMID] [PMCID]
  26. Olsson E, Lau M, Lifvergren S, Chakhunashvili A. Community collaboration to increase foreign-born women s participation in a cervical cancer screening program in Sweden: A quality improvement project. Int J Equity Health. 2014; 13:62. [DOI:10.1186/s12939-014-0062-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  27. Grandahl M, Tydén T, Gottvall M, Westerling R, Oscarsson M. Immigrant women’s experiences and views on the prevention of cervical cancer: A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2015; 18(3):344-54. [DOI:10.1111/hex.12034] [PMID] [PMCID]
  28. Marques P, Nunes M, Antunes MdL, Heleno B, Dias S. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women in Europe: A scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2020; 19(1):160. [DOI:10.1186/s12939-020-01275-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
  29. Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Sanchez IA, Cano MA, Byrd TL, Vernon SW, et al. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cervical cancer screening among Latinas. Health Educ Behav. 2015; 42(5):621-6. [DOI:10.1177/1090198115571364] [PMID] [PMCID]
  30. Bahmani A, Baghianimoghadam MH, Enjezab B, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad SS, Askarshahi M. Factors affecting cervical cancer screening behaviors based on the precaution adoption process model: A qualitative study. Glob J Health Sci. 2015; 8(6):211-8. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p211] [PMID] [PMCID]
  31. Farzaneh E, Heydari H, Shekarchi AA, Kamran A. Breast and cervical cancer-screening uptake among females in Ardabil, Northwest Iran: A community-based study. Onco Targets Ther. 2017; 10:985-92. [DOI:10.2147/OTT.S125344] [PMID] [PMCID]
  32. Kaneko N. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among young unmarried Japanese women: Results from an internet-based survey. BMC Womens Health. 2018; 18(1):132. [DOI:10.1186/s12905-018-0623-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
  33. Hanske J, Meyer CP, Sammon JD, Choueiri TK, Menon M, Lipsitz SR, et al. The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2016; 89:140-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017] [PMID]
  34. Woldetsadik AB, Amhare AF, Bitew ST, Pei L, Lei J, Han J. Socio-demographic characteristics and associated factors influencing cervical cancer screening among women attending in St. Paul's Teaching and Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20(1):70. [DOI:10.1186/s12905-020-00927-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
  35. Gahremaninasab P, Shahnazi M, Farshbaf Khalili A , Ganbari S. [Factors related to cervical cancer screening among women referring to health centers in Tabriz, Iran 2012 (Persian)]. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2014; 16(89):15-24. [DOI:10.22038/ijogi.2014.2576]
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Health Education
Received: 2022/08/23 | Accepted: 2022/08/23 | Published: 2022/12/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.